X

Download Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces PowerPoint Presentation

SlidesFinder-Advertising-Design.jpg

Login   OR  Register
X


Iframe embed code :



Presentation url :

Home / Education & Training / Education & Training Presentations / Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces PowerPoint Presentation

Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces PowerPoint Presentation

Ppt Presentation Embed Code   Zoom Ppt Presentation

PowerPoint is the world's most popular presentation software which can let you create professional Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces powerpoint presentation easily and in no time. This helps you give your presentation on Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces in a conference, a school lecture, a business proposal, in a webinar and business and professional representations.

The uploader spent his/her valuable time to create this Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces powerpoint presentation slides, to share his/her useful content with the world. This ppt presentation uploaded by anju390 in Education & Training ppt presentation category is available for free download,and can be used according to your industries like finance, marketing, education, health and many more.

About This Presentation

Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces Presentation Transcript

Slide 1 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001
Slide 2 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web
Slide 3 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query
Slide 4 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc.
Slide 5 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch
Slide 6 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results
Slide 7 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results
Slide 8 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries?
Slide 9 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method
Slide 10 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object
Slide 11 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection
Slide 12 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare
Slide 13 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix
Slide 14 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix
Slide 15 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix
Slide 16 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix
Slide 17 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3
Slide 18 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views:
Slide 19 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views: Example: 3 Projection Query minimize sum of similarity scores stored views: query views:
Slide 20 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views: Example: 3 Projection Query minimize sum of similarity scores stored views: query views: 3D 1 vs. 2 Query Projections
Slide 21 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views: Example: 3 Projection Query minimize sum of similarity scores stored views: query views: 3D 1 vs. 2 Query Projections 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 Query Projections 3D
Slide 22 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views: Example: 3 Projection Query minimize sum of similarity scores stored views: query views: 3D 1 vs. 2 Query Projections 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 Query Projections 3D 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections
Slide 23 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views: Example: 3 Projection Query minimize sum of similarity scores stored views: query views: 3D 1 vs. 2 Query Projections 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 Query Projections 3D 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections
Slide 24 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views: Example: 3 Projection Query minimize sum of similarity scores stored views: query views: 3D 1 vs. 2 Query Projections 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 Query Projections 3D 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections Conclusion, Future work 2D outline query interface looks promising Different and/or additional input, 2D: skeletons silhouette edges Evaluation comparison with text query user study better model database
Slide 25 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views: Example: 3 Projection Query minimize sum of similarity scores stored views: query views: 3D 1 vs. 2 Query Projections 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 Query Projections 3D 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections Conclusion, Future work 2D outline query interface looks promising Different and/or additional input, 2D: skeletons silhouette edges Evaluation comparison with text query user study better model database Acknowledgements Princeton Shape Analysis Group csstaff@cs, CS department technical staff NSF http://shape.cs.princeton.edu/search
Slide 26 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views: Example: 3 Projection Query minimize sum of similarity scores stored views: query views: 3D 1 vs. 2 Query Projections 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 Query Projections 3D 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections Conclusion, Future work 2D outline query interface looks promising Different and/or additional input, 2D: skeletons silhouette edges Evaluation comparison with text query user study better model database Acknowledgements Princeton Shape Analysis Group csstaff@cs, CS department technical staff NSF http://shape.cs.princeton.edu/search Search Engine Website initial 48 hr. crawl resulted in 23,000+ VRML models 2,000 have been processed, about 20-25 % are single objects (some duplicates) rest is terrains, visualizations, VEs, too simple, molecules, etc. they are cached and available for download
Slide 27 - Evaluating Sketch Query Interfaces for a 3D Model Search Engine Patrick Min Joyce Chen, Tom Funkhouser Princeton Workshop on Shape-Based Retrieval and Analysis of 3D Models Tuesday October 30, 2001 Goal Shape-based search engine for 3D models on Web 3D Model Search Engine Shape Signatures Analysis 3D Model Database Shape Signature Query Result Compare Analysis User Query Challenges Web crawling directed search Shape indexing shape distributions symmetry descriptors etc. Query interface text sketch etc. Sketch Query Interface Spectrum More descriptive Easier input 2D Sketch 3D Sketch 3D Sketch Example Results 2D Sketch Example Results Which Sketch Interface is “Better” User study (future) Log behavior of users with 2D and 3D interfaces Required to assess “ease of input” In preparation Initial study without users Use 3D models themselves as 3D queries Use projections of 3D models as 2D queries Compare discriminating power Can 2D queries be as discriminating as 3D queries? 133 models classified into 25 categories Same dataset as Osada et al. 4 Mugs 6 Cars 3 Boats Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions Osada et al., I3D 2001 Evaluation Method 3D Comparison Method Database with D2 distributions Query D2 distribution Query Result Compare Query object 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database projections per model Query projection 2D Comparison Method 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 7 Database D2 distributions per model Query 2D distribution Compare diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 3D Similarity Matrix diagonal nearest neighbor first tier first two tiers query models matches 2D Similarity Matrix Multiple 2D Projections Query 2 1 3 4 7 6 5 Database D2 distributions Query 2D distribution Compare 2 1 3 Example: 3 Projection Query stored views: query views: Example: 3 Projection Query minimize sum of similarity scores stored views: query views: 3D 1 vs. 2 Query Projections 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 Query Projections 3D 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections 3D vs. Three Projections 3D Three 2D Projections Conclusion, Future work 2D outline query interface looks promising Different and/or additional input, 2D: skeletons silhouette edges Evaluation comparison with text query user study better model database Acknowledgements Princeton Shape Analysis Group csstaff@cs, CS department technical staff NSF http://shape.cs.princeton.edu/search Search Engine Website initial 48 hr. crawl resulted in 23,000+ VRML models 2,000 have been processed, about 20-25 % are single objects (some duplicates) rest is terrains, visualizations, VEs, too simple, molecules, etc. they are cached and available for download Thank You
 

Frequently Asked Questions

> About SlidesFinder?

Slidesfinder is a website that allows users to upload and share their PowerPoint presentations online. It provides a platform for individuals and businesses to share their ideas and knowledge through presentations, and for others to view and download these presentations for educational or professional purposes.
Slidesfinder offers a wide range of presentation topics and categories, including business, education, science, technology, health, and more. Users can also search for presentations using keywords, tags, or by category. The website provides tools to create professional presentations with rich media, animations, and graphics.



One of the key features of Slidesfinder is its user-friendly interface, which allows users to easily upload, view, and share presentations. Users can also embed their presentations in their websites or blogs using the website's embed code feature.
Slidesfinder also offers premium services, such as the ability to create private presentations and to download presentations in high-quality formats. However, the basic features of Slidesfinder are free to use, making it accessible to anyone who wants to share their ideas and knowledge through presentations.

> How do I register with SlidesFinder?

Go to registration page (you can see signup link on top of website page) https://www.slidesfinder.com/signup . If you have facebook/gmail account them just click on SIGN IN WITH FACEBOOK OR SIGN IN WITH GOOGLE button, by this you will be a registered member of slidesfinder without filling any form, required detail automatically will be fatch from your account. If you do not a Facebook account, then click on "Signup". Fill all required fields and you will be a registered member of slidesfinder.

> Is slidesfinder account confirmation is mandatory?

Yes it is mandetory to active your account to login.

> Do I need to signup/login on SlidesFinder before uploading a PowerPoint presentation?

Yes, you need to login with your account before uploading presentation. Your username will be displayed on your uploaded presentation. Your registered email id is needed for sending your stats of uploaded presentation.

Slidesfinder is a sharing website for PowerPoint presentations search and share. Find your interest in the form of powerpoint presentations on slidesfinder and save your valuable time . On Slidesfinder you get presentations from our huge library of professional ppt presentations. We believe in making your search INFORMATIVE and FUN. Find your best ppt presentation from a pool of PowerPoint presentations stacked under important industry categories like business & management, heath & Wellness,eduction & training etc. We provide unique informative PowerPoint presentation for marketers, presenters and educationists. These professional PowerPoint presentations are uploaded by professionals from across numerous industry segments.These ppt presentations are available for FREE download.

Not just finding your interest, but facilitate you broadcast your interest. We have created this platform for easy sharing of PowerPoint presentations, ensuring that these presentations get maximum exposure. Create your slidesfinder account and upload PowerPoint presentations for free, share on social media platforms and BUILD YOUR CROWD WITH PRESENTATION !!

The Great Buddha says, "Share your knowledge.It’s a way to achieve immortality"! So, start sharing knowledge and we are here to make that immortal !!

© 2013-2024 SlidesFinder. All rights reserved.

Re-productivity of content are not allowed. Without prior written permission from author, commercial use of any content is illegal.